Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:01

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine Says It Attacked Crimean Bridge as Traffic Halted - Bloomberg.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
I gave Google’s AI Mode a shot, but I’m still sticking with Perplexity - Android Authority
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why can’t my wife just accept the fact that I’m going to cheat?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Bennett signs 8-year contract to stay with Panthers - NHL.com
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.